Portfolio Examples

Case 1: Pathology
Case 2: Pathology
Case 3: Radiology

Comprehensive Clinical Laboratory report for a 66-year-old patient

Laboratory Results:

CRP: 29.9 mg/L; RF: 13.91 IU/ml; Uric acid: 0.427 mmol/L; RBC: 4.53 x10^6/μL; Hb: 14.03 g/dl; HCT: 42.80 %; MCV: 94.40 fL; MCH: 31.0 pg; MCHC: 32.8 g/dl; RDW: 15.4 %; Platelets: 141 x10^3/μL; WBC: 3.9 x10^3/μL; Neutrophil %: 29.2 %: Lymphocytes %: 54.5 %; Monocytes %: 7.2 %; Eosinophil %: 8.7 %; Neutrophil Abs Count: 1.1 x10^3/μL; Lymphocytes Abs Count: 2.1 x10^3/μL; Monocytes Abs Count: 0.3 x10^3/μL;

Interpretation

Part 1

Laboratory results show an active inflammation + immune system abnormality but not a classic bacterial infection pattern (because WBC and neutrophils are low)

The likely diagnosis considerations are: 1) Viral infection (very plausible) because of high CRP (can occur in severe viral illness), low WBC + neutropenia and relative lymphocytosis; 2) Autoimmune /inflammatory disease such as rheumatologic conditions (even with negative RF) Vasculitis or connective tissue disease especially if symptoms like: Joint pain, Fatigue, Fever are present; 3) Bone marrow suppression / hematologic issue suggested by: low WBC, low neutrophils, low-normal platelets, viral suppression and early hematologic disorders could be the causes. 4) Allergic / parasitic component due to eosinophilia. Correlation could be made with allergies or medications.

The most alarming results are Neutropenia (ANC 1.1) showing an increased infection risk and high CRP confirming a significant underlying process.

Combination of these two factors may require prompt clinical evaluation.

Doctor should consider the following:

  •     Repeat CBC (to confirm trends)
  •     Infection workup (viral panels, cultures)
  •     Autoimmune screening (ANA, ESR, etc.)
  •     Medication review (drug-induced cytopenias)
  •     Possibly bone marrow evaluation if persistent
  •  

Conclusion:

This is not a normal result. The pattern most strongly suggests: An active inflammatory condition with immune system involvement,
most likely viral or autoimmune, but hematologic causes must be ruled out.

Part 2

After reviewing the patient’s clinical history and medication details received, the following management plan was proposed

Step1: Urgent imaging of the hip (priority) which detect early necrosis. This critical given her inability to walk.

Step 2: Re-evaluate the diagnosis (Rheumatology referral). The Current treatment is symptomatic only, not disease-modifying.

Order:

ANA, anti-CCP

ESR (along with CRP)

Repeat RF

Possibly HLA-B27 (if indicated)

Goal: identify type of inflammatory arthritis

Step 3: Adjust medications (very important)

Problems with current regimen:

Long-term Prednisone → serious risks:

Osteonecrosis

Infection

Bone loss

Chronic Diclofenac → GI, kidney, CV risks

Recommended approach:

Gradually taper prednisone (do NOT stop abruptly)

Start Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) therapy if inflammatory arthritis confirmed:

Methotrexate (first-line in many cases)

Use NSAIDs cautiously or switch to safer alternatives if needed

Step 4: Manage hip pathology (depending on imaging)

If avascular necrosis confirmed:

Early stage → conservative + offloading

Advanced stage → orthopedic referral for possible hip replacement

Step 5: Address bone health

Long-term steroids = high fracture risk

Start:

Calcium + Vitamin D

Consider bisphosphonates

Step 6: Evaluate cytopenias

Repeat CBC

Rule out:

  • Drug effect
  • Chronic disease
  • Hematologic disorder

Step 7: Infection screening

Because of:

  • High CRP
  • Neutropenia
  • Steroid use
  • Check: Urine, chest, possibly viral tests              

What Should NOT Continue

  • Long-term steroids without diagnosis 
  • Treating arthritis symptomatically only 
  • Ignoring hip pain progression 

Practical Plan (Simple Version)

MRI hip urgently refer to rheumatologist

Taper prednisone carefully start disease-modifying therapy (if confirmed)

Protect bones (Ca + Vit D ± bisphosphonate)

Repeat blood counts + investigate abnormalities

Bottom Line

This patient likely has untreated inflammatory arthritis with a serious complication (possible hip osteonecrosis from steroids).

The priority is:

  • Confirm the hip diagnosis (MRI)
  • Stop relying on steroids alone
  • Start proper disease-modifying treatment

 

17 April 2026

Prof Kensese Mossanda

Pathologist (Clinical Biochemistry & Molecular Biology)

Clinical Laboratory report for an HIV patient treated over 2 years period.

Laboratory results: HIV Monitoring

Basic status: CD4: 421 cells/µL; Viral load: 43300 copies/mL; HIV Log: 4.64;

After 1 year and 5 month treatment: CD4: 495 cells/µL; Viral load: < 40 detected copies/mL;

After 1 year and 4 month treatment: CD4: 416 cells/µL; Viral load: 12800 copies/mL; HIV Log: 4.1;

 Integrated Timeline Interpretation

Phase

Viral Load

CD4

Diagnostic Meaning

Baseline

High

Moderately low

Active untreated HIV

Early ART

Suppressed

Improved

Effective therapy

Later ART

Rebounded

Declined

Loss of control

 

Overall Diagnostic Summary

Summary:
The patient initially presented with active HIV replication and moderate immune suppression. Following initiation of antiretroviral therapy, she achieved virologic suppression and demonstrated immunologic recovery within the first 1.5 years. However, subsequent monitoring revealed a significant viral rebound accompanied by a decline in CD4 count. This pattern is inconsistent with sustained ART effectiveness and is diagnostic of virologic failure or treatment interruption rather than a transient viral blip. Immune recovery was partial and not maintained due to renewed viral replication.

Diagnostic Implications

  • Ongoing viral replication increases:
    • Risk of progressive CD4 decline
    • Risk of HIV drug resistance
    • Risk of clinical disease progression
    • Transmission risk
  • CD4 count remains above 400 cells/µL, which is relatively protective, but future decline is likely if viremia persists
  • Continued close laboratory monitoring is diagnostically essential

Final Diagnostic Conclusions

✔ ART was initially effective
✔ Viral suppression was achieved
✔ Viral control was subsequently lost
✔ CD4 recovery was unstable
✔ Findings represent virologic failure, not a viral blip
✔ Overall course reflects intermittent HIV control over 2 years and 5 months

Summary Statement

The laboratory profile is consistent with active HIV infection with moderate immune suppression, preserved renal and hepatic function, and no current evidence of organ damage. Prompt and effective antiretroviral therapy is essential to prevent disease progression and reduce transmission risk.

22 December 2025

Prof Kensese Mossanda

Pathologist (Clinical Biochemistry & Molecular Biology)

CLINICAL HISTORY: Patient presents with a three-day history of cough, fever, and shortness of
breath.                 

No previous radiographs are available for comparison.
CHEST X-RAY
Adequate inspiration was achieved.
Normal lung volumes.
The trachea is patent and shows no deviation.
Confluent airspace opacification and consolidation are observed in the right middle lobe, causing
partial obscuration of the right heart border. The remaining lung fields are clear, with no cavitations
visualized.
A small pleural effusion on the right side is suggested by a blunted right costophrenic angle.
There is no evidence of mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy.
The cardiomediastinal ratio is normal, and no retrocardiac shadow is present.
The bony thorax is intact.
There is no indication of infradiaphragmatic pathology.

COMMENT:
Findings indicate right middle lobe pneumonia with an associated small right subpulmonic pleural
effusion. The primary consideration is a pyogenic infection. Correlation with inflammatory markers
is recommended.

Thank you for the referral.

DR ZOLELWA PHEZA
Radiologist